‘It’s an understandable move’ and Football Scotland’s Kyogo distorted title


It’s really remarkable, remarkable that anyone could be surprised by the absolute commotion that followed Kyogo’s goal against Hearts which was not offside. To recap, Sky Sports, who are the best in the business when it comes to camera angles, watched the goal and couldn’t decide if it was a correct or wrong call from the assistant referee. principal of the podium.

And even if someone could establish where Kyogo was on or off, they would have to accept that it was the tightest of calls and under such circumstances the profit could sometimes go in Celtic’s direction. Very occasionally.

On the first day of the season, Abada’s goal was clearly in play but was ruled out for offside. The mainstream media have done little, if at all, but when it’s Celtic who gets the benefit of the doubt, hell breaks loose.

And it is worse. Many Celtic sites have called this site Celtic Way for what looks like an attempt to market themselves as Celtic Fan Media sites. It’s actually Glasgow / Evening Times and The Herald, its sister site is Rangers Review and it’s edited by the former Rangers blogger on Daily Record.

Football Scotland at least doesn’t do the same, but to be very clear, this is another Daily Record website. Today they reported that the chief referee was appearing on BBC Sportsound to give his opinion on the Kyogo controversy – not the Souttar assault but the goal he scored – and they managed to change what was said in their title to advance their own agenda.

They follow up with “Kyogo Furuhashi appeared to be in an offside position when he sent Celtic winner home Thursday night… SFA chief referee Crawford Allan admitted Kyogo Furuhashi’s winning goal for the Celtic versus Hearts was offside “and they went on to say” Referee Bobby Madden reserved Neilson for his protests, but chief referee Allan conceded that Celtic’s goal should have been ruled out.

Remember what seems to be doing here is a report on what was said on Sportsound this afternoon. But here’s what Crawford Allen – and with a name like that, he’s got the perfect job – actually said.

Speaking on BBC Sportsound, Allan said: “It’s very, very tight. I’ve always said since I’ve been in this role that I will support the referees when I can and go out and say when there is. will have an error.

“On this one, it’s totally understandable, from my perspective, at real speed, as the ball passes. Kyogo, is he in front of the defender? Yeah, he probably is. You then have to watch the angle of the ball and its speed in real time.

“In real time, at real speed – it’s very, very tight. It’s an understandable decision, it’s a decision that, if we had virtual offside lines, which VAR can put in place, might help us. This is something on the whole that we are looking at.

“It’s an understandable decision. Do I think it’s offside? Yeah, I probably do. But is it understandable that the assistant did not give it? I can absolutely see why he didn’t give it out so well.

He is not sure. He thinks it may have been offside, but understands that the assistant referee made the call as he saw it and cannot find any fault in it. Remember that Sky Sports was unable to determine whether the flag should have gone up or not. The chief referee then spoke about the positioning of the assistant referee during the incident.

“Alan (Mulvanny) looks pretty good to me in terms of looks down the line. He will have communicated it to Bobby and they will have given the goal because you cannot be 100% sure the player was offside at the time.

On the heinous sin of getting Hearts out of the dropball when Madden stopped play due to Jota’s injury, Allan was not at all happy with Brother Bobby. “It’s not just blows to the head, it’s a serious injury for a player. You can argue all day over whether it was a serious injury for a player to stop the game.

“The fact that the player was taken out and replaced, Bobby’s decision at the time was that he was very close to him.” I told Bobby about it and he said it was clear the player was in tremendous pain.

“It wasn’t just the one where the player falls and screams. He said it was clear to him that an injury had occurred and he stopped the game because of it. Now that’s Bobby’s take on how he does it. It is within the laws of the game that a referee can stop play, and it is their opinion that a player is seriously injured. Is a hamstring a serious injury? Yeah, questionable.

“Where I think there is definitely a mistake from our point of view, and I discussed that with Bobby about that, was the reboot. By the time Bobby brought the whistle to his mouth, this which only lasted about half a second, Hearts was then in possession of the ball.

“What should have been done was Hearts should have had the ball lost and allowed to retain possession. So it was a very, very quick incident. At the time, his view was that the Celtic player had just stopped playing with it had fallen and when he blew Celtic still had it.

“But after looking at it and talking to Bobby, it’s clear Hearts still had it. So yeah, that should have been a drop ball for Hearts.

This is the biggest injustice in Scottish football refereeing circles since Roy Aitken stole a throw-in against former Rangers in the 1989 Scottish Cup final. But why was Crawford Allan in the game? radio today and not earlier in the season when Abada’s goal was wrongly ruled out at Tynecastle or when Rangers received maybe half a dozen big calls in their favor – the mega offside against Motherwell at Ibrox and the non-penalty against Aberdeen are just two examples.

Thank goodness for The Celtic Fan Media who will oppose this on behalf of Celtic Support. It’s just a shame that those in our meeting room prefer to do their business behind closed doors, which is to say, do Sweet FA.

Source link


Comments are closed.